The Influence of Bystander Effect on Prosocial Behavior among Pyschology Students at Manado State University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62260/causalita.v3i2.572Keywords:
Bystander Effect, Prosocial Behavior, StudentAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of bystander effect on prococial behavior in students of Psychology at Manado State University. This study used a non-probability sampling technique with a sample size of 155 participants. The measuring instrument used was a bystander effect scale and a prococial behavior scale in the form of a Likert Scale. The data analysis method used was simple regression. The results showed a beta value of -6.37, and an R value (correlation coefficient) of 0.776, the significant value obtained was 0.000 < 0.005. Therefore, H1 is accepted, indicating a significant effect of the bystander effect on prococial behavior. Based on the determinant coefficient test results for the bystander effect indicator, it is found that the R value of emotional aphaty was 0.669 or 66,9%, it means that there is a tendency for the situational influence of the bystander effect on prococial behavior by the presence of emotional aphaty among bystanders, therefore H2 is accepted.
References
Azwar, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Psikologi (II). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baron, R. A., & Bryne, D. (2005). Psikologi Sosial (Vol. 2). Erlangga.
Chin, W., W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation Modeling. In George A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davidson, M. C. (2012), Predictor Of College Women’s Prosocial Bystander Intervention: PersonalCharacteristics, Sexual Assault History And Situational Barriers. Thesis.
Farzand, M., Safdar, A., Gill, T. A., & Aqeel, M. (2022). Psychometric Development and Validation of Bystander Effect Scale in Pakistani University Students. January. https://doi.org/10.53107/nnjp.v2i1.24.g2
Fest, Jess dan Fest, Gregory J & Roberts, Tomi-Ann. (2019). Teori Kepribadian Jilid 1. Tejemahan R.A Hadwitia Dewi Pertiwi, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Ganti, N., & Baek, S. (2021). Why People Stand By: A Comprehensive Study About the Bystander Effect. Journal of Student Research, 10(1), 1–10.
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hortensius, R., & de Gelder, B. (2018). From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417749653
Rahmawati Desy, N. K., & Triningtyas, D. A. (2019). Perilaku Prososial Ditinjau Dari Presentasi Diri Dan Bystander Effect. Program Studi Bimbingan Dan Konseling FKIP Universitas PGRI Madiun, 3(1), 119–123.
Siswoyo, Dwi dkk. (2007). Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
Sitoyo S., & Sodik M. A. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing, Juni 2015.
Sondakh, K. M. A., Solang, D. J., & Hartati, M. E. (2024). Economics and Digital Business Review Hubungan Persepsi Servant Leadership Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Anggota Komisi Organisasi Pelayanan Mahasiswa Pantekosta Di Universitas Negeri Manado. 5(2), 543–550.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitaitf, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta CV.
Zaedy, S. A. A., Setiawan, A., & Iriansyah, T. (2021). Persepsi Citra Visual dan Pengaruh Bystander Effect terhadap Kehidupan Sosial di Masyarakat. Visual Heritage: Jurnal Kreasi Seni Dan Budaya, 4(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.30998/vh.v4i1.1126
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Milca Damongilala, Deetje Solang, Meike Hartati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
